For transaction counsel

Appointment, onboarding and release, in the order you will need them

Written for the person drafting the escrow provisions. It sets out what Titanium needs at first instruction, what the agreement has to settle, and the limit of Titanium's authority once funds are in.

Appointment

What Titanium needs at first instruction

None of this requires documents. It is the outline that lets Titanium tell you quickly whether it can act, and flag anything in the structure that will need attention.

The structure

What is being bought or settled, the vehicles involved and where they sit. Cross-border chains and newly formed vehicles change the onboarding position, so they are worth naming early.

The parties and their jurisdictions

Everyone who will send or receive money, not only the counterparties to the sale. Onboarding applies to recipients as well as funders.

The payee count

One seller is a simple exercise. Thirty employee shareholders across four jurisdictions is a different one. This single number predicts the timetable better than anything else you can tell us.

The timetable

Signing, completion, and any date the release mechanism keys off, such as a measurement period or a claim window.

The proposed release mechanics

How you intend release to be triggered. If that is still open, say so, and it becomes the first thing to settle.

Drafting

Three questions the agreement has to answer

Who may instruct, and what happens if one of them is unavailable. A signatory list agreed at drafting stage is a different object from a signatory list assembled on the day of completion. Name the authorised parties, the permitted channel and the form an instruction must take.

Whether release runs on instruction or on evidence. If the trigger is a document, specify the document. Do not specify a standard of satisfaction. Titanium can confirm that a specified document has been produced. It cannot determine whether an obligation has been discharged, and an agreement that asks it to is an agreement a counterparty can argue with.

What happens when the parties disagree. The agreement should state the holding position and the escalation route without requiring Titanium to adjudicate the underlying dispute. Governing law and forum are yours to choose; Titanium does not impose a default and does not represent that any forum is usual.

Onboarding

What each party will be asked for

The precise list depends on the party's jurisdiction, structure and role. Titanium confirms the applicable list after its initial review.

Individuals

Identity and address verification, and evidence of source of funds where the individual is funding the arrangement.

Corporate parties

Constitutional documents, ownership and control structure, beneficial ownership above the applicable threshold, and authorised signatory evidence.

Funds and vehicles

Structure documentation, the manager or sponsor's own regulatory status where relevant, and the contributor position appropriate to the mandate.

Every receiving party

A distribution instruction cannot be processed for a payee who has not been onboarded. This is the most common cause of a closing slipping.

Screening

Sanctions and adverse media screening on the relevant parties. Enhanced due diligence is applied on a risk-assessed basis.

Release

The limit of Titanium's authority

Titanium acts on the release mechanism written into the agreement. That mechanism may require a valid instruction from the authorised parties, or documentary evidence expressly specified in the agreement. Funds are released in accordance with the agreement, subject to applicable law and regulatory requirements.

Titanium does not determine whether a condition precedent has been satisfied, whether a milestone has been achieved, whether a warranty claim is well-founded, or how a contested distribution should be resolved. It does not provide legal, tax or investment advice, and it has no lending or advisory relationship with any party to the transaction.

Stated positively: the narrower the authority you draft, the fewer arguments the arrangement can generate. That is the point of appointing an agent whose role is mechanical.

Bring us in while the agreement is still open

The release mechanism is cheaper to settle at drafting stage than at completion. Send the outline and we will tell you what the mechanics would look like.